When AI creates or exposes new risk, who owns the mitigation?
What does reskilling cost, measured against replacing those people?
Of the people given an AI tool ninety days ago, how many work differently today?
Governance vendors document risk and leave a policy. Software vendors ship licenses and a dashboard. Training vendors sell fluency. We deliver risk and governance, workforce and economics, and adoption and human judgment.
Each of us leads our own dimensions, and all three of us are in the engagement from week zero to day ninety. You are not handed between vendors.
A 38-question diagnostic across four domains, where every question asks how a control functions rather than whether it exists on paper.
Which roles AI exposes, where those people can go, and what the move costs measured against replacing and rehiring.
Whether your people direct these tools or follow them, measured at the start and read again at day 90. The goal is judgment rather than fluency, because writing a good prompt is not the same skill as telling a good output from a confident one.
Every artifact above is produced inside the ninety days and is yours to keep, in formats your teams already use. There is no platform to keep paying for afterward.
We open by asking who owns the mitigation when AI exposes or creates new risk, and where that is written down. If your answer is quick and specific, you may not need us, and we will say so.